Are we there yet?
So Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton split the two state primaries Tuesday. Sort of.
Obama was expected to win North Carolina, but won much bigger than expected. Clinton was expected to win Indiana, but eked out a very narrow victory. By early evening as the results were coming in, some commentators and Democratic leaders among them, were saying it’s time for Clinton to drop out of the race. She is not. But Tuesday’s primary results finally gave the evening a new, pivotal feel. After all this time, it seems like the race has turned the corner and may be coming down the stretch.
There is considerable discussion about what would happen the Florida and Michigan primary results could be counted; there is the debate about whether Obama is electable, and there is an extended conversation about one paragraph in [a] story, which said, “A Clinton adviser said the situation was increasingly becoming one in which ‘she cannot be nominated and he can’t get elected.’ “
That seems to be the emerging line right now. There are a lot of comments on that blog, some interesting and some insulting, which is regrettably too common in blog comments. I particularly like the one calling for “noblesse oblige”.
So are we down that final stretch, finally? Is Clinton staying in this to position herself for some significant role in the a Democratic administration and/or the party? Does she really think she can still win?
Clinton has a chance at winning in a few of the remaining states, but the likelihood of her taking the delegates she needs to win is nearly insurmountable…Still, she argues the count is close. Clinton touched on this theme Tuesday night, citing the “he wins one, she wins one†nature of the campaign.
Well….he won a whole bunch on Super Duper Tuesday, securing a huge bloc of delegates, and her wins since early March still haven’t brought her to any point that seriously threatened Obama’s lead. Now, this.
Despite narrowly winning Indiana, while losing North Carolina, Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton did not fundamentally improve her chances of securing the Democratic presidential nomination. If anything, Mrs. Clinton’s hopes for overtaking Senator Barack Obama dwindled further on Tuesday night.
Obama’s victory is all the larger given all the controversy he has struggle to overcome lately, between his wife’s remarks on different occasions reflecting a bleak picture of America, Obama’s own remarks about bitter and angry working class Americans clinging to their guns and religion, and his pastor’s inflammatory remarks on all sorts of issues, mostly racial.
That he was able to hold his own under those circumstances should allow him to make a case that he has proved his resilience in the face of questions about race, patriotism and political mettle — the very kinds of issues that the Clinton campaign has suggested would leave him vulnerable in the general election.
There’s an interesting line in this article, a common-sense look at what to make of the ups and downs of the Democratic campaigns. It’s a quote that says nothing has really changed.
“Unfortunately for her, the math reasserts itself,†said Carter Eskew, a Democratic consultant not affiliated with either candidate.
And here’s the math:
…after 50 nominating contests, there are only 6 left, with just 217 pledged delegates left to be elected, not enough to get either of them over the 2,025 threshold necessary to win the nomination.
Mr. Obama’s aides said Mrs. Clinton would have to win close to 70 percent of the remaining pledged delegates and superdelegates to win the nomination, a shift in the campaign’s trajectory that would seem possible only if some big development came along to hurt Mr. Obama.
That’s one possibility. Another involves Florida and Michigan, the superdelegates, and more victories in the remaining primaries.
The other big hope for the Clinton campaign is making the argument that Mr. Obama would suffer against Senator John McCain, the likely Republican presidential nominee. The exit polls gave Mrs. Clinton ammunition in that regard: half the Democrats who voted in Indiana and North Carolina said Mr. Obama’s association with Mr. Wright was very or somewhat important.
And in Indiana, for example, less than half of Mrs. Clinton’s supporters said they would support Mr. Obama in a general election, while one-third said they would vote for Mr. McCain. About one-fifth of Mr. Obama’s supporters in Indiana said they would vote for Mr. McCain in a general election should Mrs. Clinton get the nomination. Many of those Democrats can probably be expected to stay with their party in the end, but the figures suggest the intensity of the passion dividing Clinton and Obama supporters at the moment and the challenge facing the eventual nominee in uniting the party.
In his victory speech last night, Obama said he believes the party will unify behind whichever candidate is the party’s nominee.
But we’re not there yet.