Convention tipping point
Pundits say the Democratic National Convention was fine but a little flat in the early going. That all changed Wednesday night, and now, the grand finale.
Peggy Noonan has one of the best pieces out there looking at the week, and the big gamble on the final night.
On the Clintons:
As for Bill Clinton’s speech, halfway through I thought: The Master has arrived. Crazy Bill, the red-faced Rageaholic, was somewhere else. This was Deft Political Pro Bill doing what no one had been able to do up to this point at the convention, and that is make the case for Barack Obama…
The Hillary speech was the best of her career. Toward Obama she was exactly as gracious as she is capable of being…Mrs. Clinton’s actions this week have been pivotal not only for Obama, but for her. She showed herself capable of appearing to put party first.
Now, about presidential nominee Barack Obama. There’s been buzz all week about the major undertaking of his move to Invesco field, with high cost and logistical nightmares. Once the construction of the stage advanced, the buzz increased to the ‘Greek temple-like’ setting. Yes, the columns and capitals do give the feel of Washington architecture, and he wants to stand in that setting looking presidential. Okay.
But even before the speech of his life (to this point), this setting is already speaking to a lot of people. Noonan’s take on it is most interesting.
The general thinking among thinking journalists, as opposed to journalists who merely follow the journalistic line of the day, is that the change of venue Thursday night to Invesco Field, and the huge, open air Obama acceptance speech is…one of the biggest and possibly craziest gambles of this or any other presidential campaign of the modern era. Everyone can define what can go wrong, and no one can quite define what “great move” would look like. It has every possibility of looking like a Nuremberg rally; it has too many variables to guarantee a good tv picture; the set, the Athenian columns, looks hokey; big crowds can get in the way of subtle oratory.
The sound checks of the warm-up bands (warm-up bands?) in the early hours of the day Thursday exposed some problems in that open-air stadium. Acoustics, mostly. But this is more intriguing, Noonan’s insight from having been a presidential speechwriter.
My own added thought is that speeches are delicate; they’re words in the air, and when you’ve got a ceiling the words can sort of go up to that ceiling and come back down again. But words said into an open air stadium…can just get lost in echoes, and misheard phrases.
For some reason, a line from Pope John Paul II’s Rapid Development (about the importance of media and social communications) just came back to me. He said that modern technologies increase the speed and accessibility of communication, “but they above all do not favor that delicate exchange which takes place between mind and mind, between heart and heart, and which should characterize any communication at the service of solidarity and love.”
That’s going to be extra difficult in a massive open-air sports stadium all built up with stage props and echo factors and tens of thousands of people in the round.
There’s some talk this morning that behind the scenes, some of the planners now wish they were staying indoors at the Pepsi Center, where it has unfolded well so far.Â
People working the technical end of the event are talking about poor coordination, unclear planning, and a Democratic National Committee that just doesn’t seem capable of decisive and sophisticated thinking.
Their intent was clear and appreciable: go big.
At a Time magazine event Wednesday afternoon, Obama campaign manager David Plouffe suggested the power of the stadium event is in this: it’s meant to be a metaphor for the openness and inclusiveness that has marked the Obama campaign. Open stadium, 60,000 people – “we’re opening this up to average Americans.” We’ll see. In my experience when political professionals start talking metaphors there’s usually good reason to get nervous.
One thing it will be, besides impressive to some degree, is historic.
0 Comment
Just goes to show how ridiculous “pundits” truly can be.
The setting and speech were a glorious, brilliant SUCCESS. It put McCain and company on notice, in no uncertain terms, that we are all proud Americans, that we love our country and do, in fact, put it first. There are certainly differences of opinion on the direction of the country, but let’s not forget, this is what makes us great. Obama reminded us that NO ONE may question another’s commitment to this great land of ours just because he has the audacity to run for office.
Regarding Peggy Noonan’s shameful, lame prediction that the setting “has every possibility of looking like a Nuremberg rally; it has too many variables to guarantee a good tv picture; the set, the Athenian columns, looks hokey; big crowds can get in the way of subtle oratory” looks completely ridiculous. The visuals of the event were, in a word, spectacular. The speech itself, awesom.