Glossary for media usage
That the major media have redefined words beyond their original meaning is not news, though it would be to them, if only they got it.
But it’s unusual to see them called out on it by other media professionals. Like this purist who not only identifies the buzzwords most often misused, but gives you a handy guide for how to read them in context.
George Orwell, he notes up front…
was particularly irritated with the way political words were used “in a consciously dishonest way. That is, the person who uses them has his own private definition.†Far too many political articles, he wrote, consisted “largely of euphemisms, question begging, and sheer cloudy vagueness.†Such usages were “deliberately intended to deceive.”
Scary, how much more relevant Orwell is today than even when he was around publishing his provocative works.
So, go down the list of most commonly used terms, and what they’re intended to mean today. Like “activist”, “diversity”, “progressive” (that’s a good one).
It’s interesting to contrast the use of “progressive†with another label that has lately come into use — “right-wing†or “extreme right-wing.†From context it is usually clear that the writer has something in mind more than just people who object to liberal policies; between the lines we can hear the marching feet of fascist militias. Likewise, when you see the apparently neutral label “conservative†applied to a person or a policy, you can be sure that what is going to follow will not be complimentary.
Worse still, the word “conservative†is often used in ways that Edmund Burke would never recognize…
Which brings up the point that those who follow geopolitics know that “liberal” means something very different in other countries than it does in the US, and even within….say….Church affairs, something very different today than it did before and during the Second Vatican Council.
Words mean things.
The prospect that mainstream journalists will sharpen their vocabulary and start calling things by their correct names is highly unlikely…It is intimately related to the rapid decline of the traditional media, a decline not yet concluded. Precision in language is an expression of accuracy in thought — or, as Orwell put it, “the slovenliness of our language makes it easier to have foolish thoughts.†The emergence of an independent media on the Internet may help to clarify meanings, or at least introduce a proper discussion of what words really mean.
Thanks to the proliferation of social communications media today, even the term ‘mainstream’ is losing its meaning. At least when applied to what we not long ago referred to as ‘major media’.
0 Comment
A few months ago, I was hospitalized, and I did not have access to Fox News, or the internet, and if I wanted to watch any kind of news, I had to rely on the broadcast networks. Their blatent attempt to manipulate the ‘news’ frustrated me to the point where I simply gave up.
According to the so called ‘mainstream’ media, President Bush is responsible for all the problems in American society, and the current resident of the White House is a tireless advocate for ‘human rights, as opposed to property rights.’ That statement supposes that property is not a human right.
Someone who knows a lot more about this than I do explained what happens: The New York Times decides what is news, and other papers and the broadcast networks and CNN follow like lemmings. They don’t like an infallible Pope, but they love the idea of an infallible NYT.
These people don’t know they are radicals; they consider themselves ‘mainstream,’ One of the times Dan Rather was not lying was when he said that he didn’t know anyone who voted for President Reagan. Very few people in the Peoples’ Republic of the Upper West Side did vote for him.
You are right; Big Brother loves the kind of language used by the ‘mainstream media,’ and controlling the past is the key to controlling the future.