How to get a message from the Pope to Obama

When the Vatican speaks to or about the president, does anything short of a direct phone call even reach him?

Someone asked me that in an email this week, out of concern that Obama either doesn’t see the pope’s message, or hear about it. And if he does, whether it would have any impact. The latter, who can say. But sometimes the media carry reports of the Vatican’s reaction to laws and decisions involving social policy, and they like to pose it as a confrontation, of course.

Like Time does here.

With unusual speed, the Vatican has condemned Obama’s Jan. 23 repeal of the ban on U.S. funding for foreign family planning aid groups who offer abortion services.

Note the phrasing and here, aimed at directing readers’ sentiment using favorable words like ‘groups who offer services’, never mind that abortion terminates life. Follow the terminology.

The repeal fulfils a campaign promise Obama made to pro-choice [pro-abortion] supporters. But if the late Friday afternoon signing was an attempt to get the change in under the radar, it didn’t work. Top Vatican officials, usually hesitant to respond directly to Washington’s domestic policy decisions, pounced quickly. By Saturday afternoon, the Holy See was emailing reporters the Sunday edition of its official daily, L’Osservatore Romano, which features a front page headline describing Obama’s decision as “very disappointing.”

The same day, the secular Milan daily Corriere della Sera published an interview with a top Vatican official lashing out

lashing out? 

at the new U.S. President. Archbishop Rino Fisichella, head of the Pontifical Academy for Life, told the newspaper that the repeal of the abortion-funding ban was done with “the arrogance of those who, having power, think they can decide between life and death.” Troubled by the swiftness of Obama’s pro-choice [pro-abortion] move, Fisichella brushed off earlier vows by the new president to try to cut the number of abortions, while ensuring a woman’s access to the procedure. “On ethical questions, you can’t play with words,” said the Italian Archbishop, considered close to Pope Benedict XVI. “Hiding behind sophisms isn’t worthy of he who has a responsibility towards citizens. People want clarity.”

That’s clarity.

It’s too early to predict a deep rupture in U.S.-Vatican relations.

(Then why raise it?)

There was no mention of the issue in Sunday’s regular Angelus ceremony, and the Pope personally sent warm messages of congratulations to Obama after both his election victory and inauguration. But don’t count on Benedict staying silent as Obama ushers in more liberal laws for abortion or stem cell research.

Embryonic stem cell research, to clarify.

At least they got the new CatholicVote.com ad in there.

0 Comment

  • I read an AP article on Friday discussing President Obama’s reversal of Mexico City. It cited ‘anti-abortion rights advocates’ as ‘foes’ and used warm terminology to describe abortion rights advocates. Furthermore, the quotes from abortion rights advocates were ones emphasizing the lives that are being saved by this policy, and the good public policy message it sends to the world. The quotes from pro-life advocates were centered around the poor use of money this policy is. And one comment about the population control this policy seems to want to enforce. So we look like all we care about is the money, and they are made out to be the good guys who care about people.

    Any chance so called mainstream media will someday at least pretend not to have a bias??

    Thanks for all you do to raise awareness of these issues!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *