It’s all about abortion
It used to be that a nominee to the Supreme Court couldn’t be based, argued Democratic members of Congress, on a ‘litmus test’ of abortion. Now that they’re in control, that’s the only test.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein has made that most clear.
Some Democratic senators, including Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., sought answers this week on Sotomayor’s commitment to privacy rights. Meanwhile, activists on both sides of the debate continue to press senators to grill the nominee on her views of 1973’s Roe v. Wade, which made abortion legal nationwide, during upcoming confirmation hearings…
Since her nomination by President Obama last week, Sotomayor’s scant record on abortion has brought to the fore assumptions about the White House vetting process and questions about how Sotomayor might ultimately vote on disputes over a woman’s right to end a pregnancy.
Feinstein, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said after meeting with Sotomayor this week that she believes Sotomayor generally would respect precedent.
Translation: she would uphold Roe v. Wade, crafted as it was by Justice Harry Blackmun, which abortion activists insist is ‘settled law’.
On Wednesday, Feinstein explained why she will persist on the abortion rights question: “I remember what it was like when abortion was illegal, and the lives of young desperate women were in jeopardy.” She said she worries that “Americans no longer appreciate what it would mean if (abortion rights) were taken away.”
Nominees usually elude such questions during their hearings.
“I don’t have concerns about this nominee in the sense that I think there is something on the record (against abortion rights),” says Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights. “We just think it’s important for Supreme Court nominees to say where they stand.”
This did not used to be the case. Now, it’s all about that.
Said Northup of Sotomayor: “Her religious background doesn’t give me pause. I am quite aware that people’s religious views and their application of the law can be quite different.”
Interesting. When John Roberts and Samuel Alito made the fourth and fifth Catholic Supreme Court justices named to the bench, detractors railed about their religion. With Sotomayor’s nomination, her Catholicisim is no big deal. Why the double-standards?
