Why some resisted the Obama bandwagon

Multi-millionaires back Obama

There’s no question the candidate has great appeal. He’s intelligent, impressive, has great momentum. Joining his campaign has been a movement more than a political act for many people.

But some were compelled to resist, in spite of the ‘coolness factor’, because of the human factor. Here’s a good explanation by one of them.

Let’s start with the Declaration of Independence crafted by the Founding Fathers.

That the specifics of that historic moment might be lost on excited legions gearing up to vote is sad. That it’s not lost on those who seem to own the current patent on Change is disturbing.

The Declaration of Independence could be viewed as the mind to the Constitution’s body. Or, the blueprint to its structure. In it, the Founders enumerated rights ranked in an order of priority—even if some among us attempt Cirque de Soleil-worthy contortions to deny it.

The first of these is the right to life. That wasn’t minted in the Vatican but rendered by the Founders themselves—a group largely antagonistic to Rome. It doesn’t require episcopal ordination to acknowledge that, in the unique edifice of state designed by the Founders, the right to life was set as the cornerstone.

Why has this not been discussed more? Recall the wording of that document, at this late hour: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Life, to repeat Kelleher’s point, is pre-eminent. But in politics, it has been re-defined.

In the case of abortion, as the science rolls in and the facts become harder to refute, a new tactic has been deployed to shift the focus. “OK, so, it may be a human life but that’s not the same thing as a person.” Some are more honest, if more shocking. Last week Rabbi Michael Lerner, leader of the progressive Tikkun movement, urged Californians to reject a referendum requiring parental notification of their child’s request for abortion, saying, “I would support a different kind of ‘cooling off process’ were it proposed. I believe that an abortion should be thought of as ‘justifiable homicide.’”

As reprehensible as this thinking about human life is, it is at least intellectually honest for someone who believes in abortion. And if a single abortion is homicide, roughly 50 million of them in the 35 years since Roe constitutes genocide. To affirm, uphold and aggressively enshrine as law the ability to commit ‘justified homicide’ into the future is to choose choose “the curse” instead of “the blessing”, as Moses presented it under the first Law.

Somewhere between Moses and Rabbi Lerner, things went off course.

Ours, thankfully, is a culture in which the suffering of animals is increasingly acknowledged and protested.

Yes, there are signs posted on beaches that destroying sea turtles is a federal offense, among other harms to God’s creatures. 

Yet, the brutal truth of what abortion is and does remains too horrific for us to face. This is why denial runs so viscerally deep and why our response demands indefatigable commitment to a clarity anchored in charity.

I’m so glad he used my favorite phrase….’clarity with charity’. Assume good intentions. Just assume those who adhere to beliefs that may be homicidal are terribly uninformed, or in deep denial.

To say, “one point three million deaths each year” exerts a numbing effect on the mind. Of course, we are capable of making a distinction and do so daily at a level of cognitive dissonance. We know how it goes. When a pregnancy is embraced, it’s obviously a child that’s growing in our midst. When it’s not wanted, it’s a fetus—instantly a different thing.

Pause for a moment…..

Just this evening, I received an email from a cousin’s daughter I very seldom hear from, but always in important family moments. She attached ultrasound photos of her baby and remarked about how this child is already sucking his thumb (she doesn’t know the gender). She talked about the baby’s movement and how this child seems to sleep in the morning and play in the afternoon and after dinner. Amazing, I thought, how for the ‘pro-choice’ movement, it’s a child when it’s wanted, and something other than human when it’s not…

Back to Kelleher’s piece:

Attempts to manipulate Catholics with the charge that they’re single-vote obsessives driven by some pelvic theology, is just bogus—a betrayal of the truth for today’s equivalent of thirty pieces of silver.

Good line, Tim.

And this bears repeating—the pre-born are so different in degree of innocence, they constitute a unique class of victim.

Genocide has been condoned as ‘ethnic cleansing’ (what madness condones that?), and the atrocities against the Jewish religion are beyond human comprehension. The new class of victims can be called ‘the inconvenients’, as a devout seminarian pointed out to me last week.

To wrap:

I like Barack and understand the enthusiasm. He seems a personification of the hope we presume is inherent to change. I wish I could get on board. I might even seem as cool as the people around me. Yet, behind the sheer charisma and smooth layers of nuance, compatibility with prophetic gospel imperatives is hard to see. Approval of the death penalty, an announced readiness to act militarily against Pakistan in a move that would make Iraq look like a weekend paint-ball game. These don’t point to consonance with Christian concerns, not in a way that seems truly to distinguish him from his opponents. And, then, there’s his willingness to countenance the fifty million we Americans add to every day and which depletes us on every conceivable level.

We are gravely wounded by the depletion of all the human beings who may have been professors and priests, lawyers and leaders, brother and sisters and…Mother Teresas. By the pharmacicsts and psychologists, prayer warriors and prime ministers. And maybe even a potential pope. And a president. A pro-life president, who understands what a jarring phrase that even is, since we used to know this. And can never deny.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *