You’re accountable for what you say

 You’re accountable for what you say

Photo by Startup Stock Photos on Pexels.com

Well, we have to add some qualifiers here. Some people are accountable for some things they say, under certain conditions, depending on who they offend.

And then there’s the question of what constitutes accountability. We recall when Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano issued a threat assessment saying right-wing extremists might recruit returning military veterans “to boost their violent capabilities”, offending all sorts of Americans. And when Judge Sonia Sotomayor was on the record saying that a female Hispanic judge would come to a better decision in court than a white male judge. And when President Obama said at a White House press conference, in spontaneous remarks, that the Cambridge, Mass., police had acted “stupidly” in their response to an incident in which he knew one of the parties but not many of the details. And so on…

But when those incidents happened, no matter who was offended, the response wasn’t exactly an apology.

Now that it’s come to light that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid made some offensive remarks about Obama during the 2009 campaign, the major news media are all over the story about Reid’s remorse and Obama’s forgiveness.

Here’s just one, WaPo’s.

Reid is very, very sorry, they (and all the other media) say.

“Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) apologized Saturday for referring to President Obama in private conversations during the 2008 presidential campaign as “light-skinned” and as having “no Negro dialect.”

“I deeply regret using such a poor choice of words,” Reid said in a statement.

“I sincerely apologize for offending any and all Americans, especially African Americans, for my improper comments.”

Dropping down a bit further in the story, we see this:

“The swiftness of Reid’s apologies underscored the sensitivity surrounding remarks involving the subject of race.”

It would seem that the swiftness of Reid’s apologies underscored the weight and gravity of party politics. (After all, Obama downplayed Sotomayor’s comments that had elements of both racism and sexism.)

Now look at how they end the damage-control piece. The very last lines, sort of an afterthought:

“In 2007, while a presidential candidate and senator from Delaware, the current vice president drew criticism for a similar remark about Obama.

“I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy,” Joe Biden said.”

How quickly we forget some things. How sorry it is that politics and media determine what level of remorse is in order.

0 Comment

  • Here, Obama is not called black, but coloured, precisely because he is literally half white. The first “African-American” president idea is a farce, but then again in America, anyone can be what they want to be. Who cares if his ancestors were never slaves, and that he is truly nominally African-American.

  • And let us not forget that when officials were looking for candidates to fill the Senate seat left vacant by the President were being searched for and considered, the Senate leadership lobbied against another black filling the seat (that also received little press).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *